Childhoods at the Margin: The Meaning of Diagnosis in Identity Formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.97.145.8

Abstract

This article examines how the diagnostic perspective on certain psychological disorders, such as ADHD, impacts the identity formation of children. We begin by analyzing how the meaning ascribed to a diagnosis can serve two markedly different functions for those affected. In contexts where a disorder diagnosis is understood as a form of social divergence, children may rely on it to positively construct their own identity, affirming themselves through difference. Conversely, in environments where the diagnosis is interpreted as a behavioral abnormality, children are likely to be stigmatized for their behavioral divergences and subjected to various forms of injustice, ultimately undermining their self-esteem. The article is structured into three sections. The first critically discusses the notion of diagnostic reliability in relation to the conceptual distinction between health and illness within the psy sciences during the 19th and 20th centuries, emphasizing the need to clarify the meaning of diagnosis by acknowledging the distinction between abnormality and normativity, often neglected by a medicalized view. The second section explores social normativity within an adult-centered framework that conceives children as lacking agency, a view that generates different forms of injustice —testimonial, hermeneutical, affective, and motor— for children diagnosed with ADHD, as they struggle to fully comply with structured norms. In this sense, the child is placed in a silent process of identity construction, which, under the pressure of "normalizing†behaviors, permeates their sense of self-confidence and shapes how they engage in self-care to meet a regulatory ideal. The third section seeks to approach the perceptual experience of children with ADHD through certain insights from Merleau-Ponty's philosophy of perception, aiming to redirect the validation of diagnosis toward recognizing the value of divergence and childhood itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Katherine Mansilla Torres, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú

Katherine Mansilla Torres (UNMSM, Perú) es doctora en Filosofía por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, magíster en Ciencia Política (mención Asuntos Públicos) por la Universidad Católica de Lovaina (Bélgica) y magíster en Filosofía por la Pontifica Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Profesora de Filosofía en la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM) y en la PUCP. Cuenta con más de 10 años de experiencia en gestión universitaria en las áreas de investigación y relaciones interinstitucionales. Es investigadora de RENACYT, especializada en temas de fenomenología, ética, política y filosofía del cuerpo; y miembro del Círculo Latinoamericano de Fenomenología (CLAFEN), el Círculo Peruano de Fenomenología y Hermenéutica (CIPHER) y el grupo de investigación EPISTEME de la UNMSM.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (5ª ed.) En: https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Balbuena, F. (2016). La elevada prevalencia del TDAH: posibles causas y repercusiones socioeducativas. Psicología educativa, 22(2), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2015.12.002

Ballester, R., & Balaguer, E. (1995). La infancia como valor y como problema en las luchas sanitarias de principio de siglo en España. Dynamis: Acta Hispanica and Medicinae Scientiarumque Historiam Illustrandam, (15), 177-192. http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Dynamis/article/view/108732/149976

Barnes, E. (2016). The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability. Oxford University.

Boorse, C. (1975). On the Distinction between Disease and Illness. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 5(1), 49-68.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265020

Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a Theoretical Concept. Philosophy of Science, (44), 542-573. https://bioetyka.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/06_BoorseHealthConcept.pdf

Canguilhem, G. (1989). Lo normal, lo patológico. Siglo XXI Editores.

Casas, F. (1998). Infancia: perspectivas psicosociales. Paidós.

Castañeda, J, & Fraga, T. (2023). Estudio de caso sobre un incorrecto diagnóstico de TDAH. Pulso. Revista de Educación, (46), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.5370

Chapman, R. (2023). Empire of Normality. Pluto Press.

Daniels, N. (1985). Just Health Care. Cambridge University Press.

Díaz, A., Jiménez, J. E., Rodríguez, C., Afonso, M., & Artiles, C. (2013). Consideraciones de los estudios de prevalencia del trastorno por déficit de atención con o sin hiperactividad (TDAH). Revista de Psicología y Educación, 8(2), 155-170. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3729/372937690005.pdf

Doyon, M. (2022). On the Phenomenology and Normativity of Multisensory Perception. Husserlian and Merleau-pontian Analyses. En S. Heinamaa, M. Hartimo. e I. Hirvonen (Eds.), Contemporary Phenomenologies of Normativity: Norms, Goals, and Values (pp. 107-125). Routledge.

Foucault, M. (2008). El nacimiento de la clínica. Siglo XXI.

Foucault, M. (2015). Historia de la locura en la época clásica. Tomo I. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Grecco, D. (2003). La patologización mental de la identidad como estrategia deshumanizante: apuntes desde la fenomenología. En F. Romero, M. Santamaría y L. Sáez (Eds.), Alrededor de la psique: reflexiones filosóficas sobre la psicopatología y su historia (pp. 49-67). Universidad de Granada.

Horwitz, A. (2002). Creating Mental Illness. The University of Chicago Press.

Husserl, E. (2008). La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental (J. Iribarne, Trad.). Prometeo.

Lemoine, M. (2025). Philosophy of Physiology (1a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009370394

Lusardi, A. (2019). Current Trends in Medicalization: Universalizing ADHD Diagnosis and Treatments Sociology Compass 13: e12667. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12667.

McRuer, M. (2006). Teoría Crip. Signos culturales de lo Queer y de la discapacidad.Kaótica.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993). Fenomenología de la percepción. Planeta-De Agostini.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). Psychologie et pédagogie de l’enfant. Cours de la Sorbonne 1949. Verdier.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). El mundo de la percepción. Siete conferencias. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Smith, M. (2012). Hyperactive: The Controversial History of ADHD. Reaktion Books.

Sparaci, L. & Gallagher, Sh. (2025). A Kaleidoscope of Play: A New Approach to Play Analysis in Childhood. Philosophical Psychology, 38(2), 718-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2234938

Srinivasan, A. (2018). The Aptness of Anger. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(2), 123-144. https://users.ox.ac.uk/~corp1468/Research_files/jopp.12130.pdf

Tapia, J. A. & Espejo, M. (2016). Performatividad médica de la infancia en el abordaje pediátrico de enfermedades crónicas. Quaderns de Psicologia, 18(2), 85-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1332

Tuncer-Ebetürk, I, Kim J., & Nuhoğlu Soysal, Y. (2025). The global rise in children’s attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder prevalence: a macro-sociological explanation. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaf153

Welsh, T. (2013). The Child Natural Phenomenologist. Primal and Primary Experience in Merleau- Ponty’s Psychology. Northwestern University Press.

Wong, M (2021, enero 12). What’s behind the increase in ADHD. Standford University. https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/whats-behind-increase-adhd

Wehrle, M. (2022). (Re)turning to Normality? A Bottom-Up Approach to Normativity. En S. Heinamaa, M. Hartimo e I Hirvonen (Eds.), Contemporary Phenomenologies of Normativity: Norms, Goals, and Values (pp. 199-218). Routledge.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Mansilla Torres, K. (2026). Childhoods at the Margin: The Meaning of Diagnosis in Identity Formation. Letras, 97(145), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.97.145.8

Issue

Section

Dossier 2026-1

Most read articles by the same author(s)