The reform of the Hospice of Nuestra Señora de Atocha in Lima during the Eighteenth Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.96.143.1Abstract
The historiography's approach to the church of the Hospice of Nuestra Señora de Atocha (Lima) has been extensive, pointing out the similarities with Borromini's models and opening debates about the consequences of the 1746 earthquake and the design of the church. A recent study by Gauvin Alexander Bailey, published in the Burlington Magazine, has revitalized those debates about the building. Nevertheless, there is a lack of information about the hospice and the church before the decade of the1740s. The article will be based on the report of 1720 by the architects Íñigo de Eraso and Eugenio de Atienza and their proposals for the hospice and church, viewed in relation to the later reforms. Aspects such as the improvement of health, changes in the configuration of the building or the condition of the church will be examined. Moreover a plan for the hospice drawn up by a military engineer under the viceroyalty of Manuel de Amat will be analyzed regarding the importance of the military engineers and the application of a new architectural language. The unpublished documents and plans found allow a better knowledge of the building and its architecture. This documentation comes from various institutions: the General Archive of the Indies, the British Library, and the Library of Catalonia.Downloads
Métricas alternativas
References
Arguedas, J. M. (1968). No soy un aculturado. https://redaccion.lamula.pe/2013/01/18/jose-maria-arguedas-yo-no-soy-un-aculturado/albertoniquen/
Arguedas, J. M. (1988 [1971]). El zorro de arriba y el zorro de abajo. Horizonte.
Arguedas, J. M. (1989). Indios, mestizos y señores. Horizonte.
Casanova, P. (2004 [1999]). The World Republic of Letters. Traducido por M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Casanova, P. (2005). Literature as a World. New Left Review, 31, 71-90.
Castro, J. de. (2008). The spaces of Latin American literature: tradition, globalization, and cultural production. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chakrabarty, D. (2007 [2000]). Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Histori-cal Difference. Princeton University Press.
Cheah, P. (2016). What is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature. Duke University Press.
Collazos, O., Cortázar, J. y Vargas Llosa, M. ([1970] 2011). Literatura en la revolución y revolución en la literatura. Ciudad de México, Siglo XXI Editores.
Cortázar, J. (1979). La literatura latinoamericana a la luz de la historia contemporánea. Inti: Revista de literatura hispánica, 1(10), 11-20. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/inti/vol1/iss10/3
Cortázar, J. (1994). Obra Crítica III. Alfaguara.
Damrosch, D. (2003). What is World Literature. Princeton University Press.
Feldman, I. A. (2012). Las metáforas de la colonialidad y descolonización en José María Arguedas y Frantz Fanon. Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana, 75, 77-94.
Gaspar, M. (2017). Apuntes para una teoría de la traducción latinoamericana. Litera-tura: teoría, historia, crítica, 19(2), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.15446/lthc.v19n2.63183.
Guibert, R. ([1974] 2015). Siete voces. Los más grandes escritores latinoamericanos se confiesan con Rita Guibert. Traducido por Alfred A. Knopf. Penguin Random House.
Jameson, F. (1986). Third-World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism. Social Text, 15, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/466493
Krystal, E. (2002). ‘Considering Coldly...’ A Response to Franco Moretti. New Left Review, 15, 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013206205317.
Lienhard, M. (2010). La antropología de J. M. Arguedas: una historia de continuidades y rupturas. Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana, 72, 43-60.
Lugones, M. (2007). Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System. Hypatia, 21(1), 186-209. https://doi.org/10.2979/HYP.2007.22.1.186
Mignolo, W. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs. Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Mignolo, W. (2002). The Geopolitics of Knowledge. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57-96. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-1-57
Montaldo, G. (1994). La sensibilidad amenazada; fin de siglo y modernismo. B. Viterbo Editora.
Montaldo, G. (2006). La expulsión de la república, la deserción del mundo. En Ignacio M. Sánchez Prado, América Latina en la “literatura mundial” (pp. 255-270). Instituto Internacional de Literatura Iberoamericana, Universidad de Pittsburgh.
Moraña, M. (2010). La escritura del límite. Iberoamericana, Vervuert.
Moreiras, A. (2001). The Exhaustion of Difference. The Politics of Latin American Cultural Studies. Duke University Press.
Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on World Literature. New Left Review, 1, 54-68.
Moretti, F. (2005). World-Systems Analysis, Evolutionary Theory. ‘Weltliteratur’. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 28(3), 217-228.
Prendergast, Ch. (2004). Debating World Literature. Londres: Verso.
Quijano, A. (1998). Colonialidad del poder, cultura y conocimiento en América Latina. Ecuador Debate, 44, 227-238. https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/xmlui/handle/10469/6042
Quijano, A. (1992). Colonialidad y Modernidad/Racionalidad. Perú Indígena, 13(19), 11-20.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South (traducido por Michael Ennis), 1(3), 533-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Quijano, A. y Wallerstein, I. (1992) Americanity as a Concept, or the Americas in the Modern World-System. International Journal of Social Sciences, 134, 549-557.
Rama, Á. (1982) Transculturación narrativa en América Latina. Siglo XXI.
Rama, Á. (1985). Las máscaras democráticas del modernism. Fundación Ángel Rama, Arca Editorial.
Schwartz, M. E. (1999). Writing Paris. Urban topographies of Desire in Contemporary Latin American Fiction. SUNY Press.
Siskind, M. (2016 [2014]). Deseos cosmopolitas. Modernidad global y literatura mundial en América Latina. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis. An Introduction. Duke University Press.
WREC-Warwick Research Collective. (2015). Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature. Liverpool University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
