Reseñas Vol. 82 Núm. 117 (2011): Enero - Diciembre

Espezúa Salmón, Dorian. Todas las sangres en debate: científicos sociales versus críticos literarios. Lima, Magreb, 2011; 356 p.

2012-05-11 p. 221-225

Autores/as

  • Miguel Vargas Yábar

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

BALDWIN, J. M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist, 30; pp. 441-451.

BAHRICK, L. E. (1988). Intermodal Learning in Infancy: Learning on the Basis of Two

Kinds of Invariant Relations in Audible and Visible Events. Child Development, 59; pp. 197-209.

BARKOVICH, A. J. et alii (2001). Callosal agenesis with cist. A better understanding and a new classification. Neurology, 56; pp. 220-227.

BATES, E. (1999). Plasticity, localization and language development. In Sarah H. Broman & Jack M. Fletcher (eds.) The Changing Nervous System: Neurobehavioral Conse- quences of Early Brain Disorders; pp. 214-253. New York: Oxford University Press.

BENíTEz BURRACO, A. (2006). Genes y lenguaje. Teorema XXVI/1; pp. 37-71.

BENíTEZ BURRACO, A. (2009). Genes y lenguaje. Aspectos ontogenéticos, filogenéticos y cog- nitivos. Barcelona: Editorial Reverté.

BOECKX, C. & GROHMANN, K. (2007). The Biolinguistics Manifesto. Biolinguistics 1; pp. 1-8.

BOSMAN, C. et alii (2004). FoxP2 and the language working-memory system. Trends In Cognitive Science 8; pp. 251-252.

CALVIN, W. & BICKERTON, D. (2000). Lingua ex Machina. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CARROLL, S. (2005). Endles Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Ma-

king of the Animal Kingdom. New York: W. W. Norton. CHANGEUX, J.P. (2002). L’Homme de vérité. París: Odile Jacob.

CHOMSKY, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. CHOMSKY, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge: CUP.

CHOMSKY, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36; pp. 1-22.

CONTI-RAMSDEM, G., BOTTING, N. & FARAGHER, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic Markers for Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psyquiatry, 42, 6; pp.741-748.

CORBALIS, M. (2004). FoxP2 and the mirror system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8; pp. 95-96.

CUTLER, A. et alii (1983). A Language-Specific Comprehension Strategy. Nature, 304; pp. 159-160.

DEACON, T. (1997). The symbolic Species: The coevolution of Language and the Brain.New York: W.W. Norton.

ENARD, W. et alii (2009). A humanized version of Foxp2 affects cortico-basal ganglia circuits in mice. Cell 137; pp. 961-971.

EVERETT, D. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46; pp. 621-646.

FITCH W. T. et alii (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and impli- cations. Cognition 97; pp. 179-210.

FITCH, W. T. (2009). Prolegomena to a Future Science of Biolinguistics. Biolinguistics 3.4; pp. 283-320.

FODOR, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

FRIEDERICI, A. (2009). The brain differentiates hierarchical and probabilistic grammars. In Piatelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., & Salaburu, P. (eds.) 2009. Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

GIVÓN, T. (2002). Bio-Linguistics: The Santa Barbara Lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

GOPNIK, M. (ed.) (1997). The inheritance and innateness of grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HAUSER, M. et alii (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298; pp. 1569-1579.

HJELMSLEV, L. (1943). Prolegómenos a una teoría del lenguaje. Madrid: Gredos (1971).

HURFORD, James R. 2007. The Origins of Meaning (Language in the Light of Evolution). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

JACKENDOFF, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

JACKENDOFF, R. & PINKER, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language. Cognition 97; pp. 211-225.

JENKINS, Lyle. 2000. Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: CUP.

JENKINS, Lyle (ed.). 2004. Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics (North-Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic Variations 62). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

KIRSCHNER, M. & GERHART, J. (2005). The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma. New Haven: Yale University Press.

KNÖRNSCHILD, M et alii (2009). Complex vocal imitation during ontogeny in a bat. Biology Letters, 5; pp. 1-4.

LENNEBERG, E. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.

LI, G. et alii (2007). Accelerated FoxP2 evolution in echolocating bats. Public Library of Science One 2 e900.

LIGHTFOOT, D. (2006). How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: CUP.

LIEBERMAN, Ph. (2006). Toward an Evolutionary Biology of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

LOHNDAL, T. and NARITA, H. (2009). Internalism as Methodology. Biolinguistics, 3.4, pp. 321-331.

LONGA, V. & LORENzO, G. (2008). What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition? Linguistics 46 (3); pp. 541-570.

LONGA, V. (2009) Everything You Wanted to Know About the Genetics of Language (and Beyond). Review in Biolinguistics 3.4; pp.412-419.

LÓPEz GARCíA, A. (2002). Fundamentos genéticos del lenguaje. Madrid: Cátedra.

LORENzO, G. & LONGA, V. (2003). Minimizing the genes for grammar. The minimalist program as a biological framework for the study of language. Lingua, 113; pp. 643-657.

MARCUS, G. (2004)The Birth of the Mind. How a Tiny Number of Genes Createsthe Complexi- ties of Human Thought, New York: Basic Books.

MEHLER, J. & DUPOUX, E. (1990). Naître Humain. París: Odile Jacob.

PIAGET, J.; CHOMSKY, N. et alii (1983). Teorías del lenguaje / Teorías del aprendizaje: el deba- te entre Jean Piaget y Noam Chomsky. Barcelona: Crítica.

PINKER, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc. PINKER, S. & JACKENDOFF, R. (2005). The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition 95; pp. 201-236.

PEIRCE, Ch. S. (1878): Deduction, Induction and Hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, XIII; pp. 470-482.

POEPPEL, D. & EMBICK, D. (2005). Defining the relation between linguistics and neu- roscience. In Anne Cutler (ed.). Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Corner- stones, pp. 103-120. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

POLLOCK, J-Y. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Lin- guistic Inquiry, 20, 3, Summer; pp. 365-424.

SAHIN, N. et alli (2009). Sequential Processing of lexical, grammatical and phonological information writen Broca's Area. Science, vol. 326,16 october 2009; pp. 445-449.

SMITH, N. & TSIMPLI, I.-M. (1995). The Mind of a Savant. Oxford: Blackwell.

SMITH, N. & LAW, A. (2007). Twangling instruments: Is parametric variation definitional oh human language? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 19; pp. 1-28.

STRIEDTER, G. (2006). Precis of Principles of Brain Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sci- ences 29 (1); pp. 1-12.

STROMSWOLD, K. (2005). Genetic specificity of linguistic heritability. In Anne Cutler (ed.) Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones; pp. 103-120. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

TOMASELLO, M. (2001). Cultural transmission: A view from chimpanzees and human infants. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology 32, 135–146.

WADDINGTON, C. (1957). The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theo- retical Biology. London: Allen and Unwin.

WEXLER, K. et alii (2004). Verbal syntax and morphology in Dutch normal and SLI children: How developmental data can play an important role in morphological theory. Syntax 7; pp. 148-198.

Descargas

Detalles

Publicado

2012-05-11

Páginas

p. 221-225

Número

Sección

Reseñas

Cómo citar

Espezúa Salmón, Dorian. Todas las sangres en debate: científicos sociales versus críticos literarios. Lima, Magreb, 2011; 356 p. (2012). Revista Letras UNMSM, 82(117), p. 221-225. https://revistaletras.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/le/article/view/220