Español

Abstract

This article offers a systematic critique of Thomas Kuhn's 1962 concept of incommensurability, arguing that it is untenable in both its radical and moderate formulations. The discussion addresses its ontological,  epistemological, and especially semantic dimensions. Drawing on the contributions of Davidson, Kripke, and Coseriu, the paper challenges the feasibility of conceptual schemes, the constancy of reference, and the supposed impossibility of translation across paradigms. Additionally, it introduces an original argument supported by linguistic data on color categorization and children's acquisition of causal reasoning, reinforcingthe view that experience precedes and transcends language. The article further contends that languageenables subjects to step beyond their cultural or theoretical paradigms to critically analyze them. This capacity for reflexivity and empirical contrast —through the use of basic statements— provides a compelling avenue for addressing localized instances of incommensurability without resorting to conceptual relativism.